CAN  MASS AND ENERGY BE EXACTLY EQUAL?

Can Mass And Energy be Exactly Equal?

 In minds of many perpetual motionists, there is no clear conception of incompatibility of perpetual motion with theory of relativity. E=MC² has hardly created any serious resentment in the mind of perpetual motionist. Since the equation provides tremendous quantity of energy, it does not directly aim to suppress forcibly the Schools of Perpetual motion as law of conservation of energy based on impossibility of perpetual motion that had been established by Helmholtz finally. However, we know that Einstein was as critical to the impossibility of perpetual motion as many others. Here I have to say something respecting the two great physicists, Helmholtz and Albert Einstein. There is no hope of reconciliation with Helmholtz and his doctrine of law of conservation of force, since it perfectly rests on impossibility of perpetual motion machine, moreover, he ridicules sevearly a perpetual motionist with many ad hominen remarks.  He considered perpetual motionist as a “bewildered intellect.” he became an arch enemy of perpetual motion  as if he wanted to abolish perpetual motion and perpetual motionists completely from the earth. As to the latter, consciously, Einstein had no direct attack on perpetual motionist. He does not hurt a perpetual motionist directly with personal remarks. Many perpetual motionists think that his equation does not stand in great opposition to the advancement of perpetual motion philosophy. Moreover, some perpetual motionists have always met E=MC2 with welcome as it predicts that tremendous amount of energy can be obtained from small amount of matter, so it is something useful for them. While patenting their device, many perpetual motionists have avoided declaring that their device was a form of perpetual motion which contradicts law of conservation of energy for they knew that patent office would out rightly reject their wonderful device. For this reason, they have also observed a reverential attitude to E= MC² without knowing complete truth, from whatever quarter it might come. Recognizing the apparent discrepancies between interpretations of its truth, inventors of free energy devices hope that satisfactory explanations and reconciliation would later ensue, and therefore, with this approach, we understand that  E= MC² has not disappointed them and thwarted their mission.

The fact that energy and mass are equivalent seemed so absurd even to Einstein that he was moved to write to a friend:

“The line of thought is amusing and fascinating, but I can not know whether the dear lord doesn’t laugh about this and has played a trick on me.”

On April 15, 1932, Tesla also considered Einstein’s premise concerning conversion of matter into force, and force into matter, as "absurd". Tesla is said to have compared this to the dissimilarity between body and mind, laying emphasis on the fact that force is a "...function of matter", and that, it is just impossible for the mind to exist without a body, "...without matter, there can be no force."[i]

The outstanding genius Tesla could never accept many of the tenets of relativity and quantum theory.  His concept of energy was akin to ‘Prana’ as it resulted from his meeting and association with Swami Vivekananda and his Vedantic teachings.   Tesla never made any connection between matter and energy, he did recognize the possibility of free and unlimited energy as demonstrated by the following statement.

“Can Man control [the ] grandest, most awe inspiring of all processes in nature?...If he could do this, he would have powers almost unlimited and supernatural... He could cause planes to collide and produce his suns and stars, his heat and light. He could originate and develop life in all its infinite forms....[Such powers] would place him beside his creator, make him fulfill his ultimate destiny.”[ii]

There is no energy in matter other than that generated by perpetual motion of its elementary particles. How can mass and energy be equivalent? Just ask yourself, does it make sense to you?  Essentially, the equation says that there is tremendous potential energy in even small amounts of mass. (e.g. Look at plutonium and thermonuclear explosions). But to say that the amount of energy that could be released from any mass is always and everywhere equal to its mass multiplied by the speed of light squared is just simply absurd on its face. That's just saying that there's plenty of potential energy in every mass. But by using mathematical wizardry to pretend that that energy is easily measurable to a precise amount somehow involving the speed of light is an idea which may make sense only to an Einstein’s relativity fanatic.

There is pretty good discussion about E=MC² on so many forums on internet.

One post from Soros has harsh remarks: “ALBERT EINSTEIN is held up as "a rare genius," who drastically changed the field of theoretical physics. However, using the technique known as 'The Often-Repeated Lie=Truth,' he has been made an idol to young people, and his very name has become synonymous with genius.

THE TRUTH, HOWEVER, IS VERY DIFFERENT. Einstein was an inept and moronic person, who could not even tie his own shoelaces; he contributed NOTHING ORIGINAL to the field of quantum mechanics, nor any other science. On the contrary -- he stole the ideas of others, and the Jew-controlled media made him a 'hero.'”[iii]

At manifested level, Mass is vehicle of energy, how a vehicle and one that which is carried by it can be exactly equivalent? According to Einstein, energy is only existent when it is possessed by mass. In absence of mass, to think that energy exists is meaningless. It is claimed that Einstein's equation represents absolute amount of energy that can be taken out from given mass. Absolute is that beyond which there is no limit. It is simply infinite, the limitless. Absolute therefore cannot be represented in quantitative form, it cannot be equated with something finite and tangible, it cannot be represented by figures or numbers or any equation.

According to Einstein equation  if  one gram of  uranium 235 is completely annihilated  into energy then  the energy that is  released is given by the equation  E= MC². Deva Ramananda says:  “According to Einstein energy has mass and mass has energy. Conversion of one form of mass into another form of mass cannot be called annihilation. An absolute annihilation is conversion of mass into a state of emptiness, or energy containing no mass - zero energy. If it could be achieved it we would obtain infinite amount of energy which cannot be represented by any equation.”

 First think of what the term 'annihilation' exactly mean? Annihilation means total destruction and in a total destruction, if that could be possible, there must be no remaining of mass in any form but only the nothingness after the process is over. If something remains, it cannot be called a annihilation.  Here in this case when one gram of U is annihilated, millions of ergs of energy are obtained in the form of light, heat and other radiation. Now all these are simply different forms of energy containing mass again of their own. So where is the total destruction or annihilation?

So question naturally arises: Has the mass really been annihilated? Therefore, it actually means that contrary to total destruction of mass, one gram of mass of uranium has merely converted itself in heat, light and radiation consisting again X gram of mass, more or less, depending on  the binding energy. Now if we have techniques, ways and means to convert mass of heat, light and other radiation further into other more subtle forms of energy, again there would be energy release in the same proportion as given by Einstein’s equation. And the process of annihilating one gram of mass completely into energy will continue until no remains of mass would be left in any form of energy or in other words annihilation would eventually result into a pure nothingness. Is such annihilation really possible? If possible then we would simply say that through annihilation of 1 gram of uranium carried out over many successive steps, one would ultimately get infinite amount of energy which would be sum of energy released at every successive step until we obtain a state of nothingness in which no mass would be left over, because this is the definition of annihilation.

Is absolute annihilation of anything possible?  Can you visualize its end product? Can you imagine a form of energy containing no mass as  the end product of process of annihilation? Certainly not, because manifested energy always exist with mass and other quality. And beyond manifested energy is one absolute, unmanifested, infinite energy which we have termed zero energy. But in Einstein equation energy does not represent zero energy.

Einstein propounded that matter and energy are equivalent and can be transmuted through the equation E = MC2.   This accounts for the vast energy released by small amounts of matter in nuclear explosions, but it also means that staggering amounts of energy are required to create even the tiniest particles of matter. It is a false conception. If we relate mechanical energy to the electrons, photons or the light energy produced by the perpetual motion machine, Einstein’s equation holds no longer true.  Conversion of energy into matter requires staggering amounts of energy. But in the case of perpetual motion, we just need to connect a generator to Orffyreus machine and take the supply to a light bulb. We would be excited  to see that perpetual motion machine produce photons easily, no staggering amount of energy is required.

Zero energy is unpresentable and unknowable by tools and technique hitherto known to us. I shall reserve a separate detailed discussion of that in next section.

Validity of E= MC2 under Question?

In Special Theory Of Relativity, the  equation E= MC² was criticized by Werner Heisenberg  one who pointed out that transmutation from energy into mass and vice versa suggested nothing unusual. Many experiments in his time showed how elementary particles could be created from kinetic energy and how such particles were annihilated to form  radiation.

Enormous release of energy of an atomic explosive has been taken as proof of the correctness of Einstein's equation. But it is not so, says Werner Heisenberg. According to him the energy of an atomic explosion comes directly from its source and is not derived from any transmutation of mass into energy. In his book ‘Physics and Philosophy’, Werner Heisenberg writes a critical historical remark on Einstein equation.

To quote him -

“It has some time been stated that enormous energies of atomic explosion are  due to the due to a direct transmutation of mass into energy, and that it is only on the basis of the theory of relativity that one has been able to predict these energies. This is, however, a misunderstanding the huge amount of energy available in the atomic nucleus was known ever since the experiments of Becqerrel, Curie and Rutherford on radioactive decay.  Any decaying body like a radium producers an amount of heat about a million times greater than the heat released in a chemical process in a similar amount of material. The source of energy in the fission process of uranium is just the same as that in the Alpha decay of Radium, namely, mainly the electrostatic repulsion of the two parts into which nucleus is separated therefore, the energy of an atomic explosive comes directly from this source and is not derived from the transmutation of mass  into energy. The number of elementary particles with finite rest mass does not decrease during the explosion.”

William R. Lyne states: “If the term "energy" is only a convenient abstraction, then it does not exist in physical form, and really describes the potential to perform work as a by-product of matter and electromagnetic radiation in perpetual motion, some of the force of which has been diverted through a path where it performs the desired work, as it goes on its merry way through the universe. Every change of form of either matter or radiation involves the "work" which induces the change, or the "work" which is induced by the change. Without work there is no change, but all work is ultimately the product of the universe in perpetual, self-sustaining motion, as a rule and not an exception.”[iv]

At the root of everything is perpetual motion. There is no energy in matter other than that generated by perpetual motion of its elementary particles that eventually manifests into a variety of forces, electromagnetic force, nuclear force, gravitational force etc.  Relation between mass and energy as stated by Einstein equation entirely loses its significance in perpetual motion. Whatever thing in perpetual motion, anything containing   mass once set in perpetual motion goes on creating indefinite amount of energy for indefinite period of time without altering mass in any way. In other words anything irrespective of the amount of mass can create indefinite about of energy by perpetual motion. So concept of equivalence of mass energy stands no longer true in perpetual motion. It looks a superfluous concept to a perpetual motionist.  A  perpetual motion machine can create indefinite amount of energy by  any given mass, be 1 kilo gram or  one ton, it makes no difference and moreover it creates energy without destroying or annihilating it, without changing anything in the environment or anything in the world - qualitatively or  quantitatively just by perpetual motion. It also shows that in physics every concept has a limited applicability. Concept of mass and energy as stated by Einstein’s equation is applicable to nuclear physics but it is rendered entirely useless when applied to perpetual motion.

There is no absolute proof for the equation. It is almost impossible to determine the quantities of various types of energy released in atomic explosion - heat, light, shock and sound waves. No method, no balance has yet been invented in which one side we can put U²³⁵ and other side various quantities of energy to see a balance after an explosion.

The following facts have been observed by a perpetual motionist who has enough experience in perpetual motion.

• Matter is substratum onto which energy act.
• Matter in perpetual motion creates force of gravity
• Gravity must create matter.
• At the root of everything is perpetual motion.

It would be at once fallacious to seek any quantitative equivalence between mass and energy, we must simply state that matter can create energy by perpetual motion. Also, matter can create gravity, and   Gravity can create indefinite amount of the matter. Like E =MC,² we hardly need to invent any equation to establish any quantitative relationship between them. To sum up, perpetual motion applies to atoms and molecules as well as to the largest heavenly bodies, and to all matter in the universe in any phase of its existence from its creation to conservation and to its ultimate dissolution.  Perpetual motion seriously contradicts famous Einstein’s equation: E = MC². Should we think that days of relativity are over?

Werner Heisenberg  says that theory of relativity as well as quantum theory have raised violent disputes among physicist and in both cases the scientific problems have finally become connected with political issues and some physicist have not hesitated to take the recourse  to political methods to carry their views through. Deva Ramananda remarks: “what if some powerful man like the president of America would have been a physicist? No matter how absurd his theory was, no real physicist would take any risk to criticize it,  Thanks God, that presidents and prime ministers of powerful countries are not physicists, if they were so, physics would have been worse than what it is   today.”

E=MC²

 Just connect an electric generator to Orffyreus’ gravity wheel and light an electric bulb. Now the important question arise:  Does the light emitted by the electric bulb correspond to any annihilation of mass of any part of the wheel?  Our present views of interrelationship of radiation and matter in the light of perpetual motion indicate that principle of conservation of mass and energy would not be valid in the form stated by Einstein’s equation. Special theory of relativity requires that the emission of radiation from a body is accompanied by a loss of mass equal E / C², where E is energy radiated and C is the velocity of light. If this is so, the law of conservation of matter can no longer be regarded as an exact law when applied to Orffyreus’ Gravity wheel that creates energy without annihilation of any form of matter. To justify validity of E=MC² scientist often indulge in false arguments. For example, in all chemical energy, changes of some kind are involved, as reactions are often exothermic or endothermic. Scientists say that in ordinary reactions however, the amount of energy absorbed or emitted is so small as to make any correction quite negligible. It is interesting to note that the conversion of mass into energy as stated by the equation E =MC² takes place when atomic energy is released.  Werner Heisenberg rejected this thesis arguing that there is no way we can measure products of fission process like radiation, heat, light, shock waves and other forms of energy to ascertain the validity of equation E =MC.²

"As I See and Realize"[i]

 Ashit Kumar Chakroborty provides some stunning cosmological revelations in his book “As I See and Realize” about the cosmological facts that are contrary to the tenets of the special theory of relativity:

“All material particles in the Cosmos undergo simultaneous creation and dissolution processes in every 2 x 10^-52 second. This means that the Cosmos exists for 2 x 10^-52 second and remains in the state of dissolution for the next 2 x 10^-52 second. Because of the smallness of time (2 x 10^-52 second), we can not perceive such continuous existence and non-existence. The basis of the quantum theories may be explained from this phenomenon.”

“Life in the Cosmos undergoes creation and dissolution processes after every 1.3436928 x 10¹⁷ seconds. During the time of dissolution of life, the excited atoms of elements in the inner cores of the cosmic bodies break through their surroundings to come out on their surfaces (Chapter XX of the book). At that time, all stars and black cosmic bodies look like fire balls that release huge amount of radiation and elementary particles in the space and destroy all living conditions in the Cosmos. The last dissolution process ended around 6 x 10¹⁶ seconds back. We now see the pictures of these dreadful events in the galaxies which are around 10²¹ kilometers away (and beyond) from us. So it is not entirely correct to develop a model of the Cosmos on the basis of these pictures or radiations. We do not presently see such events in our galaxy or nearby galaxies (which are at distances of less than 10²⁰ km from us) because the light rays reaching us from them travel for much less than 6 x 10¹⁶ seconds.”

“The atom of element is a rotating ring-system that undergoes creation and dissolution processes in every 2 x 10-52 second. An atom, therefore, resembles a fiercely rotating wheel. It has seven primary rings and thousands of sub-rings, which rotate in anti-clockwise direction around a common center. The velocity of each primary ring or sub-ring depends on its proximity to the center of rotation. The velocity of a ring that is nearer to the center, is larger than that of a ring which is further away from the center. There is no nucleus or sub-atomic particle at the center of rotation. The magnitude of the rotational velocity of each ring of the atom determines the latter's characteristics and properties.”