An alternative English translation was published in the Physics-Uspekhi: A. A. Logunov, M. A. Mestvirishvili and V. A. Petrov, "How Were the Hilbert-Einstein Equations Discovered?" Physics-Uspekhi, Volume 47, Number 6, (June, 2004), pp. 607-621.

T. Sauer, "The Relativity of Discovery: Hilbert's First Note on the Foundations of Physics", Archive for History of Exact Sciences, Volume 53, Number 6, (1999), pp. 529-575.

Leo Corry, Jürgen Renn and John Stachel's 1997 article in Science, which does not mention the mutilation of Hilbert's proofs:

"Belated Decision in the Hilbert-Einstein Priority Dispute", Science, Volume 278, (14 November 1997), pp. 1270-1273.

Internet Forums

Publisher: Vantage Pr; 1 edition (November 2000)

Language: English

ISBN-10: 0533130972

ISBN-13: 978-0533130979

Albert Einstein

The Incorrigible Plagiarist

By Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Table of Contents:

(click on each chapter to read excerpts from the book)

The Priority Myth

Space-Time,or is it "Time-Space"?

"Theory of Relativity" or "Pseudorelativism"

Hero Worship

E = mc2

Einstein's Modus Operandi

History

Mileva Einstein-Marity

Politics and Anecdotes

The Einstein Myth and the Ives Papers: A Counter-Revolution in Physics [Paperback]

Edited by Dean Turner and Richard Hazelett. Hope Publishing 2005

Questioning Einstein: Is Relativity Necessary?

by Tom Bethell Vales Lake Publishing 2005

Challenging Modern Physics: Questioning Einstein's Relativity Theories

By Al Kelly. Brown Walker Publishers 2005

Absurd Theory Of Special Relativity

by Vilas Tamhane (Author)

File Size: 1700 KB
Print Length: 239 pages
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services
Language: English
ASIN: B004OYT9J6
http://www.amazon.com/Absurd-Theory-Special-Relativity-ebook/dp/B004OYT9J6
Product Description
"Before reading theory of relativity, I knew from the results that there is something wrong with the theory. After repeated reading of the theory, I realized that my suspicion was correct. It is a wrong theory. Nevertheless, I was overwhelmed by two instances. One was exquisite equation for velocity addition and other was time dilation of moving pions. They are so compelling that I often wondered if I am prejudiced against the theory. Ultimately I found that the derivations are based on wrong assumptions and procedure.
This book brings out fallacies, inconsistencies and paradoxes in the theory of special relativity. Apart from the discussion on Ladder and Twin paradoxes, I have included some more devised by me. All said and done, I feel that there was no need for this book to prove relativity wrong. Reciprocal nature of measurements in the fundamental results of relativity makes it redundant. In fact, when relativity is applied to experiments reciprocal results of relativity are abandoned and to arrive at the desired result they tag the accelerated frame. Students find theory of relativity confusing because of this jugglery. As a theory they are taught special relativity but to explain experimental results they are asked to abandon reciprocal nature of relativity. Twin paradox is an example. Accelerated frame is marked to explain one sided result.
Students will find arguments in this book helpful in understanding relativity. Of course they should stick to the established theory to avoid wrath of teachers and examiners. Freedom of expression is not allowed so far as science of physics is concerned. It is brutally suppressed.
Your valuable reasoned arguments, for or against special relativity, will be viewed by the author dispassionately and these will be included in my next edition." -http://www.amazon.com/Absurd-Theory-Special-Relativity-ebook/dp/B004OYT9J6

ARTICLES AND BOOKS ON EINSTEIN AND RELATIVITY

Jew Watch - Leaders - Albert Einstein - The Einstein Hoax

Absurd Theory Of Special Relativity

Product Description